Ken Burns reflecting on His Monumental War of Independence Project: ‘We Won’t Work on a More Important Film’
Ken Burns has evolved into more than a documentarian; he represents an institution, a one-man industrial complex. When he has television endeavor heading for the small screen, everybody wants his attention.
He participated in “more fucking podcasts than I ever thought possible”, he says, approaching the conclusion of his extensive publicity circuit featuring four dozen cities, dozens of preview events plus countless media sessions. “There seems to be a podcast for every citizen, and I believe I’ve appeared on most of them.”
Happily the filmmaker is incredibly dynamic, as expressive in conversation as he is prolific during post-production. The 72-year-old has gone everywhere from prestigious venues to mainstream media outlets to promote his latest monumental work: his Revolutionary War documentary, an extensive six-episode, twelve-hour film project that consumed the past decade of his life and debuted this week on public television.
Timeless Filmmaking Method
Like slow cooking amidst instant gratification culture, The American Revolution proudly conventional, more redolent of The World at War rather than contemporary digital documentaries new media formats.
However, for the filmmaker, who has built a career exploring national heritage including baseball, country music, jazz and national parks, its origin story transcends ordinary historical coverage but fundamental. “As I mentioned to directing partner Sarah Botstein during our discussions, and she shared this view: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns states during a telephone interview.
Massive Research Effort
Burns, co-directors Botstein and David Schmidt plus scripting partner Geoffrey Ward referenced countless written sources plus archival documents. Multiple academic experts, covering various ideological backgrounds, contributed scholarly insights in conjunction with distinguished researchers covering various specialties such as enslavement studies, indigenous peoples’ narratives and the British empire.
Characteristic Narrative Method
The style of the series will appear similar to viewers of Burns’ earlier work. Its distinctive style incorporated gradual camera movements over historical images, generous use of period music featuring talent reading diaries, letters and speeches.
That was the moment Burns built his legacy; a generation later, currently the elder statesman of documentary filmmaking, he can attract virtually any performer. Collaborating with the filmmaker at a New York gathering, renowned playwright Lin-Manuel Miranda noted: “Nobody declines an invitation from Ken Burns.”
Extraordinary Talent
The lengthy creation process also helped regarding scheduling. Recordings took place in recording spaces, on location and remotely via Zoom, an approach adopted amid COVID restrictions. The director describes working with Josh Brolin, who made time in Atlanta to perform his role portraying the founding father then continuing to his next engagement.
Brolin is joined by multiple distinguished artists, respected performing veterans, emerging and established stars, household names and rising talent, Samuel L Jackson, Michael Keaton, Tracy Letts, British and American talent, Edward Norton, David Oyelowo, Mandy Patinkin, television and film stars, and many others.
The filmmaker continues: “Frankly, this may be the best single cast ever assembled for any movie or television show. They do an extraordinary service. Their celebrity status wasn’t the criteria. I got so angry when somebody said, regarding the famous participants. I explained, ‘These are artists.’ They represent global acting excellence and they animate historical material.”
Nuanced Narrative
Still, no contemporary observers remain, modern media compelled the production to depend substantially on the written word, combining individual perspectives of nearly 200 individual historic figures. This approach enabled to introduce audiences not just the famous founders of that era but also to “dozens of others essential to the narrative, numerous individuals lack visual representation.
Burns also indulged his personal passion for territorial understanding. “I love maps,” he notes, “and there are more maps throughout this series versus earlier productions throughout my entire career.”
International Impact
The production crew recorded across multiple important places in various American regions and in London to document environmental context and partnered extensively with living history participants. All these elements combine to depict events more brutal, complicated and internationally important compared to standard education.
The documentary argues, represented more than local dispute over land, taxation and representation. Rather, the series depicts a brutal conflict that finally engaged multiple global powers and unexpectedly manifested what it calls “mankind’s greatest hopes”.
Civil War Reality
What had begun as a jumble of grievances leveled at London by far-flung British subjects in 13 fractious colonies soon descended into a vicious internal war, pitting family members against each other and neighbour against neighbour. During the second installment, academic Alan Taylor comments: “The primary misunderstanding about the American Revolution involves believing it represented a consolidating event for colonists. This omits the fact that it was a civil war among Americans.”
Sophisticated Interpretation
In his view, the revolutionary narrative that “generally suffers from excessive romance and idealization and lacks depth and doesn’t have the respect actual events, every individual involved and the widespread bloodshed.”
Taylor maintains, a revolution that proclaimed the world-changing idea of inherent human rights; a bloody domestic struggle, dividing revolutionaries and royalists; and a global war, another installment in a sequence of conflicts between Britain, France and Spain for control of the continent.
Uncertain Historical Outcomes
Burns also wanted {to rediscover the